Zero point energy is electromagnetism
Zero point energy
The Zero point energy (also Ground state energy or Vacuum energy or Quantum vacuum) is the difference between the energy that a quantum mechanical system has in its ground state and the minimum energy that the system would have if it were described in a classical way. In thermodynamic systems that exchange energy with their environment, the zero point energy is therefore also the same as the energy of the system at absolute temperature zero.
A particle in this potential can only take on certain energies (blue), the lowest possible of these energies is above the potential minimum
One-dimensional single-particle systems
The zero point energy is usually introduced using one-dimensional systems of a particle in a potential. In classical (that is, non-quantum mechanical) physics, the lowest energy state is that in which the particle is at rest in the potential minimum. In quantum mechanics, the smallest achievable energy above the value of the minimum potential. For given example systems, this can be verified by explicitly determining the energy eigenstates.
Alternatively, this result can be obtained by using the uncertainty relation: A finite position uncertainty, which exists e.g. in bound states, generally requires a momentum uncertainty greater than zero. Therefore the momentum and the kinetic energy cannot be exactly zero. Since the kinetic energy cannot become negative:
the total energy, the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy, must therefore be greater than the minimum of the potential energy:
The standard example of zero point energy is the quantum physical harmonic oscillator. This one has the potential
thus a potential minimum ,
and the energy spectrum
Even in the energetically lowest state, the basic state with , so there is an energy different from zero:
In the classical case, the state of lowest energy is that in which the particle is in place rests, so . In quantum mechanics, however, the uncertainty relation between position and momentum prohibits both quantities from having exact values. The more precisely the location is known, the less precisely the impulse is known and vice versa. The zero point energy is clearly shown as the mean value of these fluctuations.
The Casimir effect and the Lamb shift are often interpreted as an experimental proof for the zero point energy and the vacuum fluctuations caused by it. However, it is possible to derive the Casimir effect without resorting to vacuum fluctuations. The Lamb shift is a phenomenon in an interacting quantum field theory, which accordingly Not can be attributed to the vacuum energy; the misunderstanding arises from the fact that although it is a result of virtual particle-antiparticle pair formation, which does not take place from the vacuum, but is based on interactions between fields. The experimental physicist Per Delsing and colleagues from the University of Gothenburg confirmed the dynamic Casimir effect with a test setup in 2011. The physicist A. Leitenstorfer and colleagues at the University of Konstanz measured vacuum fluctuations directly in an experiment.
The vacuum energy is considered to be a possible candidate for the dark energy, which in astronomy would offer an explanation for the observed accelerated expansion of the universe. In this context, the amount of vacuum energy represents one of the greatest problems of modern physics, since the experimentally found and theoretically predicted values for the vacuum energy as dark energy differ from one another: Based on observations, the energy density of the vacuum is reduced to a value of the order of 10−9 until 10−11 J / m3 estimated, it is around a factor of 10120 lower than in the theoretical calculations.
After abandoning the aether filling empty space as a medium for the propagation of waves and a frame of reference for the movement of bodies, the idea of a vacuum containing neither matter nor any form of energy prevailed in classical physics.
But already the radiation law of his "second theory" found by Max Planck in 1911 suggested a zero point energy of the electromagnetic field in a vacuum, since it is a variable ½ that is independent of the temperature occurred. However, Planck initially did not attach any importance to this in terms of experimental evidence.
With similar considerations, Albert Einstein and Otto Stern came to the conclusion in 1913 that the zero point fluctuations of the electromagnetic field at the absolute zero point of the temperature would lie.
Building on Planck's work, Walther Nernst suggested zero point fluctuations for the electromagnetic field around the value ½ before and on the other hand that the entire universe is filled with zero-point energy.
In 1927 Werner Heisenberg formulated his uncertainty relation, which is considered the basis of the zero point energy in every quantum mechanical system.
Georges Lemaître, who had done pioneering theoretical work on the big bang and the expansion of the universe, found in 1934 a match between the vacuum energy and Einstein's cosmological constant (1917), the introduction of which Einstein later described as the "greatest donkey" of his life.
During an investigation of the Van der Waals forces in colloid solutions, Hendrik Casimir and Dirk Polder used a quantum mechanical approach in 1947, which led to a discussion with Niels Bohr. Bohr commented on this, "that must have something to do with zero fluctuations". Casimir pursued the idea that the attraction between neutral atoms might only be based on vacuum fluctuations and published his fundamental work in 1948 About the attraction between two perfectly conductive plates. In it he described a theoretical test arrangement with two metal plates in a vacuum, which according to his calculations should attract each other due to the vacuum energy of the electromagnetic quantum field (Casimir effect).
First corresponding attempts to prove the Casimirkraft in a vacuum were carried out by Marcus Sparnaay in 1958, but with a measurement error of about 100%. Gradually the measurements reached the Casimirkraft (Value for two mirrors of 1 cm² area at a distance of 1 µm: 10−7 N) a higher accuracy, e.g. the measurement error for van Bloklands and Oveerbeeks in 1978 was 25% and for Steven Lamoreaux in 1996 it was only 5%.
In recent years the cosmological constant, which is closely related to the curvature of space-time, has again received more attention, especially since it is now viewed as a small positive energy density of the vacuum. A more recent explanation for the cosmological constant provides, for example, a cyclic universe.
Date of the last change: Jena, the: 17.03. 2021
- How are decibels regulated at concerts
- Why is Israel so inhuman
- What's the biggest forum you know
- PSU jobs require experience
- How do I calculate OTB in retail
- Ahmedabad is another Mumbai in the making
- How do you choose a good lawyer
- What materials are used in wood
- Will community get its film
- Where is Don Rickles buried
- Which actress actress has tattoos
- Who created the school system
- Play Store Jio phone install me
- How are chloroplasts inherited
- What is SQL Server DBA 20
- Induction lamps require a cooler
- Can you decipher the word UNR?
- How does the earth become a sandwich for a short time?
- Can we catch smells
- What are some unique mineral refining processes
- Which laptop should I buy to play with?
- Robert Mueller says whether it is important
- How should I prepare for online interviews?
- How do I make a killer mixtape